DVD - 2006
Average Rating:
Rate this:
In this adaptation of the Shakespeare play by the same name, Titus returns victorious from war, only to plant the seeds of future turmoil for himself and his family.
Publisher: Beverly Hills, CA : 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, [2006]
Edition: Special ed
Characteristics: 2 videodiscs (ca. 162 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment
Nov 08, 2017

over the top and sometimes ridiculous but its Shakespear minor masterpiece>>

Sep 14, 2017

I really, really liked this movie. Titus is long, chaotic, and pretty trashy and the costumes and sets are always unpredictable. I would recommend this movie to fans of over the top exploitation cinema, like Tarantino or a lot of Korean thrillers. If you're looking for a classy adaptation of high class theater, look elsewhere.

Oct 11, 2016

This movie is just too weird for me.

The juxtaposition of modern and ancient was too distracting, too bizarre, to notice the acting.

I stopped it after ten minutes.

theorbys Apr 23, 2014

I was no more bothered by the anachronisms blending the Roman Empire with the 20th century in this film than I was in the old Star Trek episode "Bread and Circuses". It makes some interesting visuals. The film was very well acted, and main reason for watching any movie or play by Shakespeare is to listen to his language.

brontelit87 Oct 03, 2013

I was disappointed with this movie. I really enjoyed Taymor's adaptation of _The Tempest_ and I was looking forward to _Titus_. However, I just didn't like all the weird mixture of the Roman and modern worlds. It would have been better if everything had been kept in ancient Rome. However, I recommend this movie for the great performances by the actors! They all did a great job with the Shakespearean language (Lange seemed to force her lines a bit, though). I definitely recommend this movie for the actors' great navigation of a poor movie overall.

Sep 20, 2013

Movie well done, but strange. Excellent acting, but too 'artistic' for us. Similar to watching Shakespeare, swapping between ancient and modern times.

RobertLR Apr 23, 2013

Stupid, Hopkins must have need to make an estimated tax payment

aaa5756 Aug 02, 2012

This movie was entertaining and interesting but not one of my favorite for this year. “Not too bad---good performance”. "I fast forwarded a lot but not all the way.”

Mar 30, 2012

"Saw" in tights. Which sucked first, the play or the film? On one hand, Shakespeare obviously wrote it to capitalize on the success of other Revenge Plays. But in no way is Titus Andronicus as good as the Duchess of Malfi or The Revenger's Tragedy. It's mix of long, can-you-top-THIS? scenes, and brooding. On the other hand, the movie is directed by Julie Taymor, who has maintained an impressively consistent level of suckage throughout her career. True, the anachronisms work, but that is because the play itself makes little sense. Why not set it any old where/nowhere? The performers take advantage of this gap to overact, because who could possibly call them on it? 1.5 stars for Jessica Lange's Joan Crawfordlike Tamora and Anthony Hopkins's blue eyes. Yes, I'm reaching.

Sep 09, 2011

I was prepared to dislike this film when I realized that there was a blend of ancient and modern elements. However, the anachronisms work well. The production is well done. The acting is good. You don't have to be a Shakespeare fan to like this film (although it helps). If you like artistic movie making, you'll like this. Recommended.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number


Subject Headings


Find it at SPL

To Top