Comment

Aug 31, 2014
Dawkin's book, while thought provoking, did not provide me with the kind of evidence needed to prove evolution, that is, macro-evolution. I believe at the beginning of the book Dawkins said, ''Evolution is a fact, and this book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientists denies this...'' Right there Dawkins commits the no true Scotsman fallacy when he used the word ''reputable'' to refer to a scientist, but I could equally well say, ''Actually, no reputable scientist accepts evolution.'' Keep in mind that I would never actually say this but I just wanted to express the absurdity in his claim. I highly recommend _In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose To Believe in Creation_ edited by Dr. John F. Ashton and also _The Ultimate Proof of Creation: Resolving the Origins Debate_ by Dr. Jason Lisle.